A critic can only review the book he
has read, not the one which the writer wrote. ~ Mignon McLaughlin, The Neurotic's Notebook, 1960
I have been waiting for Library Journal’s review of my book (click here to read review).
Reader reviews have been fabulous; so have those from my family. (Family
members have this funny tendency to say, “It is so well written,” as if they
are surprised that I can actually write.)
However, to have a review from a
journal is a big deal, and now I have one. It is a good review, EXCEPT there
was a glaring inaccuracy. It stood in space for nearly a day, this mistake for
everyone to see. However, the reviewer fixed it and in the end, all was well.
Why does this stuff disturb me?
It comes down to two issues: 1) wanting readers to get the facts, and 2) how I
look if the facts are wrong. The bottom line is I can’t do much about it, so
best not to dwell on it. The other thing I can do is be sure I have my facts
straight when I review someone else’s work.
Here’s the really amazing part—because
of the mistake, I garnered extra publicity. The review had to be sent twice and
I got to Tweet and Facebook it twice. Who would have thought that a mistake like
this would be a blessing?